The lactation skill gaps of multidisciplinary paediatric healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom

Author:

Hookway Lyndsey12ORCID,Brown Amy12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health and Social Care Swansea University Swansea UK

2. Centre for Lactation Infant Feeding and Translation Swansea UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBreastfeeding is an important public health priority and may be particularly beneficial for medically complex infants and children. However, childhood illness and disability are associated with increased challenges and lower breastfeeding rates. The Baby Friendly Initiative has been shown to increase initiation of breastfeeding and improve health professional skills although as yet the standards have not been adopted in paediatrics. Previous studies have found breastfeeding knowledge gaps among paediatric nurses, and a recent systematic review highlighted insufficient lactation support, discouragement by healthcare professionals and lack of resources. The aim of this survey of UK paediatric professionals was to establish their self‐defined confidence and skills supporting breastfeeding.MethodsAn online survey was developed to explore associations between level of training and staff confidence and perceived skill, to establish whether there is evidence that more training and/or higher breastfeeding training credentials improve skill. In total, 409 professionals, including paediatric doctors at all grades, paediatric nurses and allied health professionals, were included in the analysis.ResultsThis study identified specific skill gaps among professionals. Many healthcare professionals felt that different skills and specific training are required to support medically complex children. Several professionals noted that existing breastfeeding training focuses on establishing breastfeeding in healthy newborns rather than sick children in paediatrics. Participants were asked about 13 clinical competencies, and an aggregate skill score was calculated. Multiple univariate analysis of variance found that more extensive training and higher credentials are correlated with higher skill scores (p ≤ 0.001), whereas type of professional was not.ConclusionsDespite this being a relatively motivated sample of healthcare professionals, the findings of this study suggest that breastfeeding skills are patchy and inconsistent, and particularly lacking when it comes to more complex clinical scenarios. This is significant, because it may mean that children who have more significant illness or medical complexity are disproportionately affected by gaps in knowledge and skill. Medically complex children encounter many barriers to optimal feeding − including absence of designated paediatric lactation staff, resources and support − and may have challenges such as low tone, higher calorie need and transitioning to the breast after ventilation or enteral feeding. Current skill gaps indicate that existing training would be insufficient, and bespoke paediatric breastfeeding training based on identified clinical challenges is thus justified.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference64 articles.

1. The impact of Baby Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews

2. World Health Organization. Implementation guidance: protecting promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services: the revised baby‐friendly hospital initiative.https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272943/9789241513807-eng.pdf(2018). Accessed 25 March 2022.

3. The challenges of medically complex breastfed children and their families: A systematic review

4. Health Professionals’ Attitudes and Beliefs About Breastfeeding

5. E-learning to Improve Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Practices on Breastfeeding

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3