Deprescribing interventions for gabapentinoids in adults: A scoping review

Author:

Anderson Prue A.12ORCID,McLachlan Andrew J.1ORCID,Abdel Shaheed Christina13ORCID,Gnjidic Danijela1ORCID,Ivers Rowena4,Mathieson Stephanie5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown Australia

2. Pharmacy Department Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick NSW Australia

3. Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown Australia

4. Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Sydney Australia

5. Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney St Leonards Australia

Abstract

AbstractThe emerging issue of rising gabapentinoid misuse is being recognized alongside the lack of current evidence supporting the safe and effective deprescribing of gabapentinoids. This scoping review aimed to assess the extent and nature of gabapentinoid deprescribing interventions in adults, either in reducing dosages, or prescribing of, gabapentinoids. Electronic databases were searched on 23 February 2022 without restrictions. Eligible studies included randomized, non‐randomized and observational studies that assessed an intervention aimed at reducing/ceasing the prescription/use of a gabapentinoid in adults for any indication in a clinical setting. The research outcomes investigated the type of intervention, prescribing rates, cessations, patient outcomes and adverse events. Extracted outcome data were categorized as either short (≤3 months), intermediate (>3 but <12 months) or long (≥12 months) term. A narrative synthesis was conducted. The four included studies were conducted in primary and acute care settings. Interventions were of dose‐reducing protocols, education and/or pharmacological‐based approaches. In the randomized trials, gabapentinoid use could be ceased in at least one third of participants. In the two observational trials, gabapentinoid prescribing rates decreased by 9%. Serious adverse events and adverse events specifically related to gabapentinoids were reported in one trial. No study included patient‐focused psychological interventions in the deprescribing process, nor provided any long‐term follow‐up. This review highlights the lack of existing evidence in this area. Due to limited available data, our review was unable to make any firm judgements on the most effective gabapentinoid deprescribing interventions in adults, highlighting the need for more research in this area.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference54 articles.

1. Pfizer.Lyrica prescribing information;2018. Accessed March 7 2023.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/021446s035 022488s013lbl.pdf

2. Pfizer. Neurotin prescribing information;2017. Accessed March 7 2023.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/020235s064_020882s047_021129s046lbl.pdf

3. Therapeutic Goods Administration.Lyrica (pregabalin) Product and Consumer Medicine Information Licence;2021. Accessed March 7 2023. Available from:https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2010-CMI-05617-3

4. Therapeutic Goods Administration.Neurontin (gabapentin) Product and Consumer Medicine Information Licence;2021. Accessed March 7 2023.https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2010-CMI-04869-3

5. Gabapentin and Pregabalin for Pain — Is Increased Prescribing a Cause for Concern?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3