The advocacy process in Canadian community health nursing: A collaborative ethnography

Author:

Mccready Geneviève1ORCID,Laperrière Hélène2

Affiliation:

1. Health Science Department University of Quebec at Rimouski Rimouski Quebec Canada

2. School of Nursing University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo shed light on the process of advocacy in the context of community health nursing, through a methodology inspired by the epistemologies of the South.DesignWe conducted a collaborative ethnography in a community health centre in Canada.Methodsde Sousa Santos' epistemologies of the South, a typology of advocacy and main themes from historic research informed the methodology. Data were collected between 2016 and 2018 through 420 h of fieldwork observations and three group discussions, including a collective process to co‐construct interpretations with participants. Twenty‐one nurses participated in the study.ResultsNurses had sufficient work flexibility to practice advocacy actions focused on individuals and groups. They also engaged in attempts at policy reform in the form of defending access to appropriate care and changing the mode of care organization. However, these were curbed by bureaucracy and administrative rules, resulting in the eventual dismissal of health promotion actions and experiences of moral distress.ConclusionDespite the political climate of their work environment impeding social justice agendas, nurses' advocacy practices showed a persistence of moral values and ideals in coherence with the regional nursing legacy.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareActing at the organizational level and involving field nurses in decision making are potential avenues for increasing policy advocacy efficacy.ImpactExamining contexts through another epistemic lens and methods of research drawing on history and anthropology has shed light on a process of advocacy. This research shows that organizations need to equip themselves with mechanisms to promote the sharing of realities between nurses, thereby building collective advocacy.Reporting MethodThe research adheres to the EQUATOR guidelines with SRQR and COREQ methods.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3