Affiliation:
1. Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California USA
2. Moss Landing Marine Laboratories San Jose State University Moss Landing California USA
3. Department of Fisheries Biology California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt Arcata California USA
4. Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA‐National Marine Fisheries Service Miami Florida USA
5. Department of Geography University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
Abstract
AbstractMarine protected areas (MPAs) globally serve conservation and fisheries management goals, generating positive effects in some marine ecosystems. Surf zones and sandy beaches, critical ecotones bridging land and sea, play a pivotal role in the life cycles of numerous fish species and serve as prime areas for subsistence and recreational fishing. Despite their significance, these areas remain understudied when evaluating the effects of MPAs. We compared surf zone fish assemblages inside and outside MPAs across 3 bioregions in California (USA). Using seines and baited remote underwater videos (BRUVs), we found differences in surf zone fish inside and outside MPAs in one region. Inside south region MPAs, we observed higher abundance (Tukey's honest significant difference [HSD] = 0.83, p = 0.0001) and richness (HSD = 0.22, p = 0.0001) in BRUVs and greater biomass (HSD = 0.32, p = 0.0002) in seine surveys compared with reference sites. Selected live‐bearing, fished taxa were positively affected by MPAs. Elasmobranchs displayed greater abundance in BRUV surveys and higher biomass in seine surveys inside south region MPAs (HSD = 0.35, p = 0.0003 and HSD = 0.23, p = 0.008, respectively). Although we observed no overall MPA signal for Embiotocidae, abundances of juvenile and large adult barred surfperch (Amphistichus argenteus), the most abundant fished species, were higher inside MPAs (K–S test D = 0.19, p < 0.0001). Influence of habitat characteristics on MPA performance indicated surf zone width was positively associated with fish abundance and biomass but negatively associated with richness. The south region had the largest positive effect size on all MPA performance metrics. Our findings underscored the variability in species richness and composition across regions and survey methods that significantly affected differences observed inside and outside MPAs. A comprehensive assessment of MPA performance should consider specific taxa, their distribution, and the effects of habitat factors and geography.
Funder
California Sea Grant, University of California, San Diego
National Science Foundation
California Ocean Protection Council
Reference150 articles.
1. Structure and standing stock of the fish assemblages of San Diego Bay, California from 1994 to 1999;Allen L. G.;Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences,2002
2. The Ecology of Marine Fishes
3. A new method for non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance;Anderson M. J.;Austral Ecology,2001
4. Applying the structural causal model framework for observational causal inference in ecology;Arif S.;Ecological Monographs,2023
5. Seasonally and spatially referenced estimates of recreational shore‐angling effort, catch composition, catch rates and total catch in the Goukamma Marine Protected Area, South Africa;Attwood C.;African Journal of Marine Science,2016