Achieving bi‐directional conduction block during catheter ablation is not enough to prevent recurrence of cavo‐tricuspid isthmus dependant atrial flutter: Role of subclinical conduction

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAchieving bi‐directional conduction block, as assessed by differential pacing and change in activation along tricuspid annulus (TA), across the cavo‐tricuspid isthmus (CTI), is considered a satisfactory end point during catheter ablation of atrial flutter (AFL).AimTo assess role of subclinical conduction by observing polarity reversal of local bipolar signals from RS to QR pattern lateral to the line of ablation, in predicting recurrence of CTI dependant AFL after ablation in patients with bidirectional conduction block.Method and ResultsOf 683 patients undergoing ablation of CTI dependent AFL, 73 (10.6%) patients underwent redo flutter ablation and were evaluated further. The mean age was 60.8 years and 51% were males. Evidence of bidirectional block by differential pacing and change is activation along multipolar catheter and reversal of local bipolar signals from RS to QR pattern lateral to the line of ablation, during the 1st and subsequent procedure, were studied. 60% patients had confirmed bidirectional block of which 71% had lack of voltage reversal, at the end of 1st procedure. All patients with bidirectional block with lack of reversal of bipolar signals, after the first procedure had recurrence of AFL whereas only 3/11 (27%) people with bidirectional block and with absence of subclinical conduction had recurrence of AFL.ConclusionAchieving bidirectional conduction block is not sufficient to prevent recurrence of AFL after CTI ablation. Reversal of local bipolar signals, from RS to QR pattern along with achieving bidirectional conduction delay would reduce recurrence of AFL, post ablation.