School‐based self‐harm prevention programs: A systematic review with implications for international implementation

Author:

Liljedahl Sophie I.12ORCID,Hellner Clara3,Pettersson Agneta4,Ghaderi Ata5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry for Affective Disorders, National Specialized Medical Care Unit for Severe Self‐Harm Behaviour Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

2. Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

3. Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council Stockholm Sweden

4. Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) Stockholm Sweden

5. Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

Both self‐harm and suicidal behaviors have been targeted through school‐based prevention programs, many of which have been developed in the United States. The aims of this systematic review were to assess effects of school‐based prevention programs on suicide and self‐harm and to evaluate whether they are fit to the exporting culture. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our inclusion criteria, structured according to population/problem, intervention, control/comparison, outome, were: children and youth up to 19 years of age, school‐based programs at universal, selective or indicated levels compared with teaching as usual or with other programs, and outcomes of suicide or self‐harm measured at least 10 weeks after intervention. Studies without a control group or using non‐behavioral outcomes were excluded. A comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted from the 1990s to March 2022. Risk for bias was assessed with checklists adapted from the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool. A total of 1,801 abstracts were retrieved. Five studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria, but one had high risk for bias. Confidence in the evidence for effect was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Studies included in this review were evaluated with respect to applicability in the context of international export. Only two school‐based programs demonstrated efficacy in preventing suicidal behaviors. Although implementation of evidence‐based interventions is a crucial next step, further replication with simultaneous attention to dissemination and implementation issues are called for. Funding and registration: conducted on assignment by the Swedish government. The protocol is available at the SBU website in Swedish.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3