Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we argue two points in relation to the challenge to human distinctiveness emerging as artificial intelligence systems and humanlike robots simulate various human capabilities. First, that, in the context of theological anthropology, it is advisable to respond to this challenge by turning toward the human body. Second, following this point, we propose the responsive body hypothesis, suggesting that what makes us distinct from androids are capacities that rise from and depend on our responsive bodies.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Religious studies,Education,Cultural Studies
Reference55 articles.
1. Ahn Michael AnthonyBrohan NoahBrown YevgenChebotar OmarCortes ByronDavid ChelseaFinn et al.2022. “Do As I Can Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances.” arXiv.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.01691.
2. Empathic responses and moral status for social robots: an argument in favor of robot patienthood based on K. E. Løgstrup
3. KNOWING OURSELVES AS EMBODIED, EMBEDDED, AND RELATIONALLY EXTENDED