Amplifying the voices of Black racial minorities in mental health research through public involvement and engagement: The importance of advisory roles

Author:

Onwumere Juliana123ORCID,Gentle Anthony,Obanubi Rachel,Davis Annette,Karuga Moffat,Ali Rubbia4,Cardi Valentina45,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

2. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK

3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health South London and Maudsley NHS London UK

4. Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK

5. Department of General Psychology University of Padova Padua Italy

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEnsuring adequate representation and the active, meaningful and visible involvement of groups likely to be most impacted by research findings and/or the lack of research inquiry are increasingly acknowledged. This is particularly relevant for Black racially minoritised groups who are less visible as research participants and in patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) roles. Our viewpoint article sought to discuss reflections and insights on their involvement experience, with particular attention to perceived barriers and enablers to PPIE involvement.MethodsQualitative data were collected as part of facilitated group discussions from nine Black racially minoritised experts‐by‐experience involved in a PPIE advisory group. Data were subjected to thematic analysis to identify key themes.ResultsFive main themes were identified that reflected factors linked to practicalities: role unfamiliarity, benefits for the larger community, acknowledgement of previous harm and mental health stigma.ConclusionGiven the existence and importance of the direct links between research and service and treatment innovations in health and social care, ensuring that those from underrepresented Black racial communities are meaningfully and equitably supported to have roles in advising and influencing research programmes should be prioritised and an ongoing consideration for different stakeholders, including research funders, researchers, healthcare providers and community leaders/representatives.Patient or Public ContributionThis viewpoint article is a collaboration between lived experience stakeholders and researchers, comprising conceiving the original idea for the paper, its conceptualisation and data generation and the coproduction including editing of the manuscript.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference48 articles.

1. NHS Race & Health Observatory. Ethnic inequalities in healthcare: a rapid evidence review.2022. Accessed October 13 2023.https://www.nhsrho.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/RHO-Rapid-Review-Final-Report_Summary_v.4.pdf

2. Inequalities in referral pathways for young people accessing secondary mental health services in south east London

3. Joint Committee on Human Rights House of Commons. Black people racism and human rights.2022. Accessed February 11 2022.https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5801/jtselect/jtrights/559/55906.htm

4. Unemployment. GOV.UK. November 3 2022. Accessed October 13 2023.https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/unemployment-and-economic-inactivity/unemployment/latest

5. GormleyJ HamiltonM BeltonI.The effectiveness of sentencing options on reoffending.2022. Accessed October 13 2023.https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Effectiveness-of-Sentencing-Options-Review-FINAL.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3