Affiliation:
1. Center for Higher Education Research Southern University of Science and Technology China Shenzhen China
2. Graduate School of Education Peking University Beijing China
Abstract
AbstractAs cross‐border education continues to evolve, a comprehensive understanding of the latest trends requires an awareness of the behaviours of partner universities and host governments. This case study examines two joint‐venture universities in China and compares their institutional approaches to resource acquisition. It compares their strategies in four dimensions: initial launch, choice of name, capacity building, and strategy in leveraging resources from the local government. The divergent strategies show that both universities use their particular advantages to obtain different resources to sustain their development. This study presents a portrait of a dynamic organisational environment for cross‐border in China. While the government plays a key role in the establishment of the universities, their resource acquisition effectiveness depends on how successfully they integrate their agendas with local needs.
Reference66 articles.
1. Universities' efficiency and the socioeconomic characteristics of their environment—Evidence from an empirical analysis;Agasisti T.;Socio‐Economic Planning Sciences,2023
2. Choices of destination for transnational higher education: “pull” factors in an Asia Pacific market
3. Theoretical model for applying agency and resource dependency to public higher education;Bennett C.;Research in Higher Education Journal,2021
4. BIT. (2014).北京理工大学与莫斯科国立大学在京签订合作办学协议[Beijing Institute of Technology and Moscow State University sign cooperation agreement in Beijing].https://www.bit.edu.cn/publish/bit/xww/zhxw/a105071.htm
5. BIT. (2018).强化交流、共促合作 莫斯科大学校长萨多夫尼奇院士访问北理工[To strengthen exchanges and promote cooperation president of Moscow State University Sadovnich visited BIT].https://www.bit.edu.cn/xww/zhxw/a153712.htm