Affiliation:
1. School of Education, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia
2. Disability Innovation Institute UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundSelf‐determination is associated with lifelong positive outcomes. Students with intellectual disabilities typically have lower self‐determination than their peers. Universal basic education access offers schools the opportunity to rectify this disparity. This is the first systematic review investigating the school‐based practices that target self‐determination development for students with intellectual disabilities.MethodThe review follows the PRISMA guidelines, spanning five databases (ProQuest databases, EMBASE, Scopus, Sage Journals, Taylor and Francis Online) from 2006 to 2021.ResultsAcross the 18 studies, the most used practice is the SDLMI. Research focuses on United States‐based transition‐aged students with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. Social validity tends to be assessed in summative and informal ways. Students are not generally involved in decision‐making about practices and individualisation of support.ConclusionsSelf‐determination development for this population can begin before puberty. Future research should critically investigate social validity and holistic integration of student self‐determination learning opportunities throughout the pedagogical cycle.