The hot sex: is there evidence for climate‐driven sex allocation in mammals?

Abstract

Abstract Climate change predictions indicate that future conditions will be hotter and drier, and rainfall will be more variable. Climatic conditions can affect individual condition and shape offspring sex ratios. The implications that climate change have for mammalian sex allocation are vast but are currently poorly understood. There are several scenarios under which climate‐driven sex allocation responses might emerge. Here, I make predictions on the direction of offspring sex ratio biases under hypothetical situations of restricted resource availability and altered social/spatial structures that may result from hotter, drier conditions. I searched the literature for existing evidence of climate‐driven offspring sex ratio biases among individuals studied in wild populations. There was no strong, directional support for the production of sons or daughters under ‘good’ or ‘poor’ climatic conditions among the 30 studies had reported on climatic variables and offspring sex ratio. I also searched the literature for studies that assessed maternal condition and offspring sex ratio in natural populations (i.e. there is a link between climate, resource availability and maternal condition). Of the 27 investigations, half reported a bias in favour of sons born to mothers in ‘good’ condition (56%). I discuss how this outcome could be due to a publication bias, or that it may indicate that low resource availability has the potential to lead to mothers in poor condition and the production of fewer sons. I consider the conservation implications of climate‐driven offspring sex ratios skews being carried through to the population level. I discuss the challenge of being able to account for the multiple factors that influence offspring sex ratios in natural populations and emphasise the growing need for more research in this important area of mammalian evolutionary ecology.