Affiliation:
1. External Residence of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Mansoura Egypt
2. Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Mansoura Egypt
3. Prosthodontics Department College of Dentistry Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al‐Kharj Riyadh Saudi Arabia
4. Dental Biomaterials Department Faculty of Dentistry Mansoura University Mansoura Egypt
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo clinically evaluate the surface roughness and wear resistance of prefabricated and CAD‐CAM milled acrylic resin teeth for complete dentures.Materials and methodsIn a cross‐over study design, 10 completely edentulous patients were randomly included in this study and given two complete dentures. The first complete denture was made using prefabricated teeth, while the second was constructed using CAD‐CAM milled teeth. Following insertion (T0), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T6), the complete dentures were scanned. Utilizing 3D surface super‐imposition techniques, the vertical (2D wear), and volumetric (3D wear) material loss were measured. The hardness of the teeth was evaluated at the time of denture insertion (T0) and then after 6 months (T6) of denture insertion by digital Vickers hardness tester. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. Paired groups were compared by paired t‐test. Also, a repeated measure test was used. The significant difference was considered if p ≤ 0.05.ResultsThe time of denture function was linearly correlated with the wear of the prefabricated and CAD‐CAM milled denture tooth. Prefabricated acrylic teeth had significantly more vertical and volumetric wear after 3 and 6 months, compared to CAD‐CAM milled denture teeth where p‐values were 0.01, 0.009, 0.003, and 0.024, respectively. Additionally, CAD‐CAM milled teeth displayed significantly higher hardness values than prefabricated teeth both before and after 6 months of use where p‐values were 0.001. After 6 months, all studied teeth showed a decrease in their hardness.ConclusionsIn terms of wear resistance and surface hardness, CAD‐CAM milled acrylic resin teeth were superior to prefabricated acrylic resin artificial teeth once the complete denture functions.