The experience of shared decision‐making for patients with end‐stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families—A scoping review

Author:

Mcpeake Mari‐Louise1ORCID,Cook Neal1ORCID,Mcilfatrick Sonja2ORCID,Hasson Felicity3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences Ulster University Londonderry UK

2. Doctoral College Ulster University Belfast UK

3. School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences Ulster University Belfast UK

Abstract

AbstractAimTo identify the experiences of shared decision‐making (SDM) for adults with end‐stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members.DesignA scoping literature review.MethodA scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.Data sourcesMedline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis—scoping review extension (PRISMA‐Scr).ResultsThirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition.ConclusionPeople with end‐stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient‐driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life.Implications for clinical practiceThis review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision‐making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process.Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3