Impacts of technology implementation on nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well‐being: A realist review

Author:

Jedwab Rebecca M.12ORCID,Manias Elizabeth3ORCID,Redley Bernice4ORCID,Dobroff Naomi24ORCID,Hutchinson Alison M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Monash Health Nursing and Midwifery Informatics Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo examine current literature for causal explanations on how, why and under what circumstances, implementation of a new hospital electronic medical record system or similar technology impacts nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction or well‐being.BackgroundImplementation of new technology, such as electronic medical record systems, affects nurses and their work, workflows and inter‐personal interactions in healthcare settings. Multiple individual and organisational‐level factors can affect technology adoption by nurses and may have negative consequences for nurses and patient safety.DesignFive‐step realist review method and Realist And Meta‐narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards checklist was used to guide this review. Eight initial theories (programme theories) were used as the basis to explore, examine and refine literature from a range of sources.Data SourcesLiterature from five databases (APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore and MEDLINE Complete) and grey literature (from 1 January 2000 to 31 October 2021) were systematically searched and retrieved on 4 November 2021.ResultsIn all, 8980 records were screened at the title and abstract level, of which 1027 full texts were screened and 10 were included in the review. Seven studies assessed concepts in both pre‐ and post‐technology implementation. Most common contexts related to knowledge, rationale and skills to use new technology. Mechanisms that impacted nurses or nursing care delivery included: nurses' involvement in technology implementation processes; nurses' perceptions, understanding and limitations of technology impact(s) on patient care delivery; social supports; skills; implementation attitude and hardware. Work satisfaction was the most frequently examined outcome. An analysis led to nine final programme theories (including two original, six revised and one new programme theory).ConclusionNurses must be informed about the rationale for new technology and have the knowledge and skills for its use. Understanding nurses' work motivation and attitudes related to technology adoption in the workplace can support work engagement, satisfaction and well‐being.Implications for the ProfessionComplex contexts and mechanisms play a role in nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well‐being with the implementation of new technology into healthcare settings.Relevance to Clinical PracticeNurses, their work and workflows are all influenced by the implementation of new technologies (such as electronic medical records), which in turn has consequences for patient safety and quality of care.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.Prospero Registration NumberCRD42020131875 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131875).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference52 articles.

1. A Qualitative Case Study Exploring Nurse Engagement With Electronic Health Records and E-Prescribing

2. Aldekhyyel R. N. Melton G. B. Hultman G. &Pitt M. B.(2018).Using a bedside interactive technology to solicit and record pediatric pain reassessments: Parent and nursing perspectives on a novel workflow. Paper presented at the AMIA joint summits on translational science proceedings San Francisco United States of America.

3. Satisfaction of health-care providers with electronic health records and perceived barriers to its implementation in the United Arab Emirates

4. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review

5. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3