Working memory training in children with neurodevelopmental disorders and intellectual disabilities, the role of coaching: A double‐blind randomised controlled trial

Author:

Roording‐Ragetlie S. L.1ORCID,Pieters S.12,Wennekers E.1,Klip H.1,Buitelaar J.134,Slaats‐Willemse D.567

Affiliation:

1. Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Nijmegen The Netherlands

2. Radboud University Behavioural Science Institute Nijmegen The Netherlands

3. Department of Cognitive Neuroscience Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Nijmegen The Netherlands

4. Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands

5. Department of Psychiatry Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour Nijmegen The Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

7. Denkkracht, Center for Neuropsychological Expertise Nijmegen‐Arnhem The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWorking memory training (WMT) can offer therapeutic benefits to patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). However, consistent evidence for treatment benefits of WMT over placebo training is missing. So far, participants in double‐blind research designs did receive non‐specific coaching, whereas active coaching based on individual training results might increase the efficacy of WMT. Furthermore, the intensity and duration of WMT is often too stressful for these children. This study therefore investigated whether a less intensive but more prolonged WMT, with active personalised coaching and feedback, would reduce behavioural symptoms and improve neurocognitive functioning and academic achievements in children with NDD and MBID.MethodA double‐blind randomised controlled trial in children (aged 10;0–13;11) with MBID (60 < IQ < 85) and ADHD and/or ASD evaluated the effects of a less intensive but prolonged version of the original Cogmed WMT (30 min a day, 4 days a week, 8 weeks in total). Eighteen participants received active, personalised coaching and feedback, based on their actual individual performance during training. Twenty‐two received general non‐personalised coaching for the same amount of time. Executive functioning, academic achievements and several behavioural measurements were administered, before and after training, with a 6‐months follow‐up.ResultsWe observed a significant effect of time on both primary and secondary outcome measures, indicating that all children improved in working memory performance and other neurocognitive and academic outcomes. The interaction between time and group was not significant.DiscussionThis study was unable to document superior effects of active personalised coaching and feedback compared with general non‐personalised coaching and no feedback in an adaptive WMT in children with MBID and NDD. The objectively documented changes over time suggest that for these vulnerable children, a regular, structured and structural contact with a coach and adapted exercises is enough to develop therapy fidelity, boost motivation and improve neurodevelopmental task performance. Further research is needed to examine which possible subgroups within this heterogenic group of children profit more from WMT compared with other subgroups.

Funder

Ministerie van Defensie

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Rehabilitation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Treatment, Education, and Prognosis of Slow Learners (Borderline Intelligence);Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry;2024-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3