Affiliation:
1. University of Notre Dame
2. University of Notre Dame
3. University of Tennessee
Abstract
AbstractConventional wisdom holds and previous research confirms that for a political candidate, atheism is anathema. But the United States is becoming a more secular nation. Does secularization mean that atheists are acceptable to some Americans, specifically Democrats and voters with low religiosity? Can concerns about atheists be assuaged by appealing to the superordinate identity of “patriotic American”? Drawing on four survey experiments, we find that Democrats are more supportive of an atheist, Republicans less—producing a null effect overall. Furthermore, voters’ reactions to an atheist are not driven by the office, but are shaped by both their partisanship and religiosity. Voters’ negative attitudes are partially assuaged by framing an atheist as a patriotic war hero. As the secular population grows in the United States, it seems likely that atheists will emerge as candidates for elected office. Our data suggest that, contrary to conventional wisdom, atheist candidates are potentially electable.
Funder
American Political Science Association
University of Notre Dame
Reference62 articles.
1. Civil religion in America;Bellah Robert N.;Daedalus,1988
2. Two steps forward, one step back? Bias in the 2008 presidential election
3. The Indirect Effects of Discredited Stereotypes in Judgments of Jewish Leaders
4. Boorstein Michelle andJulieZauzmer.2016.WikiLeaks: Democratic Party Officials Appear to Discuss Using Sanders's Faith Against Him.Washington Post July 22 2016.https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts‐of‐faith/wp/2016/07/22/wikileaks‐democratic‐party‐officials‐appear‐to‐discuss‐using‐sanderss‐faith‐against‐him/?utm_term=.0915390a06fb. Accessed September 8 2024.