Application and attitudes: active restoration in the context of biodiversity offsetting

Author:

Hernandez Stephanie1ORCID,Dorrough Josh12ORCID,Ruoso Laure‐Elise3ORCID,Brazill‐Boast James4ORCID,Newman Kate5,Oliver Ian16ORCID,Plant Roel3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Conservation and Restoration Science Branch Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 12 Darcy Street Parramatta New South Wales 2150 Australia

2. Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University B141, B48, B48A, Linnaeus Way, Acton Canberra Australian Capital Territory 2601 Australia

3. Institute for Sustainable Futures University of Technology Sydney Building 10, 235 Jones Street Ultimo New South Wales 2007 Australia

4. Biodiversity Conservation Trust Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 12 Darcy Street Parramatta New South Wales 2150 Australia

5. Biodiversity Conservation Division Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 12 Darcy Street Parramatta New South Wales 2150 Australia

6. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University UWS Hawkesbury Campus, Science Road Richmond New South Wales 2753 Australia

Abstract

The global trend in offsetting for no‐net‐loss (NNL) is increasing, focusing on protecting high‐condition habitats and restoring degraded ones. Australia's New South Wales (NSW) Biodiversity Offset Scheme (BOS) promotes active restoration (AR; reconstruction of missing ecosystem properties, AR) on offset sites. We examined (1) the adoption of AR under the BOS, and (2) practical constraints and attitudes toward AR. Records of management actions on 138 proposed offset sites revealed that AR was proposed for 19.3% (12,180 ha) of the total offset area (67,310 ha). For areas with a low‐moderate condition score (26,528 ha), AR was proposed for only 27.3% (7248 ha), despite these being the areas where it would be most likely to be necessary. A survey of 111 individuals involved in offsetting policy and restoration revealed that while 76% agreed AR was necessary for NNL, financial constraints were seen as a major barrier. A structural equation model indicated that positive attitudes toward AR rules and AR as a social imperative were strongly linked to agreement on the necessity of AR for NNL outcomes. Our results indicate that attitudes could influence the adoption of AR on offset sites, even in cases where policies are explicitly designed to provide financial incentives for AR, as exemplified in the context of NSW.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3