Mixed‐methods pilot study exploring the influence of the novel Paediatric Anaesthetic Drug Solution tool on clinician cognitive load during simulated paediatric rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department

Author:

Goodier Robyn123ORCID,Partyka Christopher12ORCID,Moore Nicholas124ORCID,Middleton Paul124ORCID,Abdullah Qabirul3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Department Liverpool Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. School of Medicine University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine University of Dundee Dundee UK

4. South Western Emergency Research Institute Ingham Institute Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AimRapid sequence intubation (RSI) in children is a low‐incidence, high‐risk event associated with cognitive overload and potential errors producing unfavourable outcomes. Cognitive aids, such as charts, algorithms and flow diagrams, are prompts that externalise and structure mental processes to reduce cognitive load, thereby reducing errors. The Paediatric Anaesthetic Emergency Drug Solution (PAEDS) approach combines a colour‐coded chart and medication box with a simplified mathematical system of volume‐based dosing; the effect of which on cognitive load during a simulated RSI has not previously been described.MethodsA randomised, cross‐over trial was conducted with 26 multi‐disciplinary emergency medicine clinicians (doctors and nurses) allocated to four groups, performing four high‐fidelity RSI simulations, two mandating the use of the PAEDS approach. This mixed methods study followed the pragmatic ontology using grounded theory methodology. Qualitative data were collected from nine individual interviews by a process of thematic analysis via an inductive approach, to allow for appropriate open and axial coding to occur. Quantitative data collected included cognitive loading using the raw NASA‐Task Load Index as well as time to intubation and drug dosage details to assess for safety.ResultsQualitative results showed that the PAEDS approach reduced cognitive loading through the use of both the labelled medication box and colour‐coded medication charts. The PAEDS approach also showed improved perceived time pressure without feeling rushed, and with no recorded drug errors. Differences in the quantitative data for total cognitive load, error and time were not statistically significant, likely due to sample size.ConclusionThe PAEDS approach is a multifaceted system which is not inferior to current practice, with some components described as an improvement. Further research on a larger sample size needs to be conducted to assess the aspects of the PAEDS approach both collectively and independently.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3