Psychological interventions aiming for changing dietary habits in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Vassou Christina1,Yannakoulia Mary1,Cropley Mark2,Panagiotakos Demosthenes B.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences and Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Harokopio University Athens Greece

2. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology University of Surrey Guildford UK

3. Faculty of Health, Collaborative Research in Bioactives and Biomarkers (CRIBB) Group University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDiet is a critical component of healthy lifestyle, especially in cardiac rehabilitation. Psychological interventions, as well as mix‐treatment interventions, such as psychological components, appear promising approaches in the adoption and maintenance of a healthy diet in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Given the variety of clinical intervention programmes available, we aimed to determine whether psychological interventions and interventions that incorporate psychological components provide better lifestyle outcomes than traditional care, specifically targeting dietary outcomes, and what types of psychological or mix‐treatment interventions are more likely to benefit patients with CVD.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO to identify interventional studies, published from 2012 to 2022, written in English, evaluating psychological and mix‐treatment intervention programmes for dietary outcomes in patients with CVD. In total, 33 intervention studies (n = 5644 patients) were retrieved and analysed using fixed and random effects models.ResultsNo significant effect of the psychological intervention was observed regarding fruit and vegetable intake (Hedge's g = +1.06, p = 0.766), whereas a significant reduction was observed in alcoholic beverage consumption in the intervention group, as compared to the control group (Hedge's g = −7.33, p < 0.001). However, based on both our qualitative and quantitative analyses, psychological and mix‐treatment interventions were more effective than traditional models in dietary modification. Also, the majority of effective interventions were psychological over mixed‐treatment interventions.ConclusionsFindings add to the growing evidence suggesting that specific psychological interventions may be effective approaches in dietary modification for patients with CVD, potentially forming part of public health agenda.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3