Influence of generalist stingless bees on the structure of mutualistic flower–pollinator networks in the tropics: Temporal variation

Abstract

Abstract Stingless bees (Meliponini) are expected to play a central role in structuring mutualistic networks in the Neotropics, as they are generalist and often abundant pollinators. Living in populous social colonies with a perennial life cycle, they require continuous large amounts of resources and often forage on abundant flowerings such as mass‐flowering throughout the year. In this field research, we seek to understand how temporal variations on foraging activity of stingless bees and abundance of mass‐flowering partner plants affect the topology of the plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. The networks were compared between spring and summer, periods of high and low abundances of flowerings and mass‐flowering, respectively. Bees were sampled on flowers, in replicates of floodplain fields in Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil. Interactions with partner plants were considered effective only when bees had pollen on their bodies (potential pollinators). Through analysis of pollen grains attached to their bodies, several topological metrics of networks and functional categories were obtained. The robustness or networks resistance to secondary species loss due to simulated focal species extinction was also measured. The networks maintained similar general structure throughout the year (high nestedness, moderate modularity and connectance, low community‐level specialisation and negative dependency asymmetry). Particularly, nestedness and dependency asymmetry did not change between the two seasons. Community‐level specialisation was higher in summer, contrary to expectations, when there was a collapse in the supply of floral resources and also a reduction in the abundance and foraging pressure of stingless bees. As there was also a greater number of specialist pollinators in summer, the hypothesis of temporal displacement due to foraging pressure from generalists was proposed. At the same time, stingless bees oscillated between network hubs in spring and connectors in summer, reflecting the variation in their abundance between these two seasons. In spring, the greater concentration of foraging by these generalists in the abundant mass‐flowering probably attenuated their diffuse competitive pressure on all other pollinators, even though the foraging overlap was higher in this period. In this period of high abundance of floral resources, specialist pollinators capable of expanding the realised niche are active. Based on recent theoretical conclusions of dynamic model of mutualistic networks structure that incorporated effects of inter‐specific competition and adaptive foraging, we argue that the adaptive foraging of generalist and abundant stingless bees contributes in an important way to the high nestedness and robustness of networks, which ultimately favour the coexistence of species in the long term. Particularly, taking the high intra‐annual turnover of bee and plant species between the two seasons, and the similar floral constancy of both generalist stingless bees and specialist pollinators, we also infer that stingless bees act as generalised pollinators in the networks rewiring throughout the year.