What predicts psychosocial functioning in borderline personality disorder? Investigating the association with reflective functioning

Author:

Volkert Jana1ORCID,Ilagan Gabrielle S.2,Iliakis Evan A.3,Ren Boyu45,Schröder‐Pfeifer Paul6,Choi‐Kain Lois W.57

Affiliation:

1. Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy University of Ulm Ulm Germany

2. Fordham University New York New York USA

3. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Laboratory for Psychiatric Biostatistics McLean Hospital Belmont Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Psychiatry Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

6. Institute for Psychosocial Prevention University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany

7. Gunderson Personality Disorders Institute McLean Hospital Belmont Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with functioning in participants with and without borderline personality disorder (BPD). In particular, we were interested whether mentalizing and related social cognitive capacities, as factors of internal functioning, are important in predicting psychosocial functioning, in addition to other psychopathological and sociodemographic factors.MethodThis is a cross‐sectional study with N = 53 right‐handed females with and without BPD, without significant differences in age, IQ, and socioeconomic status, who completed semi‐structured diagnostic and self‐report measures of social cognition. Mentalizing was assessed using the Reflective Functioning Scale based on transcribed Adult Attachment Interviews. A regularized regression with the elastic net penalty was deployed to investigate whether mentalizing and social cognition predict psychosocial functioning.ResultsBorderline personality disorder symptom severity, sexual abuse trauma, and social and socio‐economic factors ranked as the most important variables in predicting psychosocial functioning, while reflective functioning (RF) was somewhat less important in the prediction, social cognitive functioning and sociodemographic variables were least important.ConclusionsBorderline personality disorder symptom severity was most important in determining functional impairment, alongside trauma related to sexual abuse as well as social and socio‐economic factors. These findings verify that BPD symptoms themselves most robustly predict functional impairment, followed by history of sexual abuse, then contextual factors (e.g. housing, financial, physical health), and then RF. These results lend marginal support to the conceptualization that mentalizing may enhance psychosocial functioning by facilitating social learning, but emphasize symptom reduction and stabilization of life context as key intervention targets.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3