The effect of the alliance on social recovery outcomes and usage in a moderated online social therapy for first‐episode psychosis

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWe investigated the effect of the therapeutic alliance on both change in social recovery outcomes and usage of a moderated online social therapy platform for first‐episode psychosis (FEP), Horyzons.DesignSecondary analysis of a single group pilot trial.MethodsClients completed an alliance measure adapted for guided digital interventions at mid‐treatment. A series of multi‐level models evaluated change in outcomes by mid‐ and post‐treatment assessments (relative to baseline) as a function of the overall alliance. Quasi‐Poisson models evaluated the effect of the overall alliance on aggregated counts of platform usage. Exploratory analyses repeated these models in terms of the bond (human–human) or the task/goal (human–program) alliance.ResultsStronger overall alliance at mid‐treatment predicted lower loneliness at mid‐treatment and lower social anxiety at mid‐ and post‐treatment. It was also associated with higher completion of therapy activities and authoring of comments and reactions. A strong bond with an online therapist was associated with lower loneliness and higher perceived social support at mid‐treatment, lower social anxiety at post‐treatment as well as a higher number of reactions made on the social network. Stronger alliance with the platform's tasks and goals facilitated lower social anxiety at both follow‐up assessments and was further associated with higher completion of therapy activities and reactions in the social network.ConclusionsThe alliance may impact aspects of social recovery and usage in digital interventions for FEP. Specific aspects of the alliance (human–human and human–program relationships) should be considered in future research.