Post‐mortem formation of ethanol: Is 1‐propanol a reliable marker? A proof‐of‐concept study using an in vitro putrefactive environment setup

Abstract

AbstractEthanol is the psychoactive substance identified most frequently in post‐mortem specimens. Unfortunately, interpreting post‐mortem ethanol concentrations can be difficult because of post‐mortem alcohol redistribution and the possibility of post‐mortem alcohol neogenesis. Indeed, in the time interval between death and sample collection, the decedent may be exposed to non‐controlled environments for an extended period, promoting microbial colonization. Many authors report that in the presence of carbohydrates and other biomolecules, various species of bacteria, yeast, and fungi can synthesize ethanol and other volatile substances in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this study was to study the impact of several variables on microbial ethanol production as well as develop a mathematical model that could estimate the microbial‐produced ethanol in correlation with the most significant consensual produced higher alcohol, 1‐propanol. An experimental setup was developed using human blood samples and cadaveric fragments incubated under strictly anaerobic conditions to produce a novel substrate, “cadaveric putrefactive blood” mimicking post‐mortem corpse conditions. The samples were analyzed daily for ethanol and 1‐propanol using an HS‐GC‐FID validated method. The formation of ethanol was evaluated considering different parameters such as putrefactive stage, blood glucose concentration, storage temperature, and storage time. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney non‐parametric test and simple linear regression. The results indicate that the early putrefactive stage, high blood glucose concentration, high temperature, and time of incubation increase microbial ethanol production. In addition, the developed mathematical equation confirms the feasibility of using 1‐propanol as a marker of post‐mortem ethanol production.