The effect of anterior quadratus lumborum block on morphine consumption in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a multicentre, double‐blind, prospective randomised placebo‐controlled trial

Author:

Coppens S.12ORCID,Somville A.1,Hoogma D. F.12ORCID,Dewinter G.12ORCID,Neyrinck A.12ORCID,Desmet M.3ORCID,Vandebroek A.3,D'Hoore A.14,Wolthuis A.14ORCID,Bislenghi G.14ORCID,Fieuws S.5ORCID,Rex S.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium

2. Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

3. Department of Anesthesiology AZ Groeninge Kortrijk Kortrijk Belgium

4. Department of Abdominal Surgery University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium

5. Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre University of Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

SummaryWe investigated the efficacy and safety of a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This was a two‐centre, double‐blind, prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial including 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery (left‐ or right hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy) who were enrolled in the institutional abdominal enhanced recovery programme. Before induction of anaesthesia, patients received a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block in the left and right lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance and were allocated randomly to receive 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% (n = 75) or placebo (saline 0.9%) (n = 75) bilaterally. Postoperatively, all patients received multimodal intravenous analgesia including paracetamol, ketorolac and patient‐controlled analgesia with morphine. The primary outcome was morphine consumption during the first 24 h after tracheal extubation. Secondary outcomes included severity of pain; presence and extent of sensory block; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; and hospital duration of stay. We also investigated the need for, and dose of, rescue analgesia. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events. Mean (SD) 24‐hour morphine consumption was no different between patients allocated to ropivacaine and placebo (28.6 (22.3) mg vs. 28.4 (22.5) mg, p = 0.966, respectively). While a sensory block could be detected in significantly more patients allocated to the ropivacaine group, no differences were detected in pain scores or other secondary or safety endpoints. Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, adding a bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block to a standard multimodal analgesia regimen did not reduce opioid consumption or improve pain scores.

Funder

European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3