“We will be the ones bearing the consequences”: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision‐making in hospital‐based maternity care

Author:

Waddell Alex12ORCID,Goodwin Denise3,Spassova Gerri4,Sampson Louise5,Candy Alix5,Bragge Peter6

Affiliation:

1. Safer Care Victoria Victorian Department of Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Monash Sustainable Development Institute Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

3. BehaviourWorks Australia Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

4. Department of Marketing Monash Business School Caulfield East Victoria Australia

5. Royal Women's Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

6. Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPregnant women involved in decisions about their care report better health outcomes for themselves and their children. Shared decision‐making (SDM) is a priority for health services; however, there is limited research on factors that help and hinder SDM in hospital‐based maternity settings. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM in a large tertiary maternity care service from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.MethodsQualitative semi‐structured interviews were undertaken with 39 participants including women, clinicians, health service administrators and decision‐makers, and government policymakers. The interview guide and thematic analysis were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM.ResultsWomen expect to be included in decisions about their care. Health service administrators and decision‐makers, government policymakers, and most clinicians want to include them in decisions. Key barriers to SDM included lack of care continuity, knowledge, and clinician skills, as well as professional role and decision‐making factors. Key facilitators pertained to policy and guideline changes, increased knowledge, professional role factors, and social influences.ConclusionThis study revealed common barriers and facilitators to SDM and highlighted the need to consider perspectives outside the patient–clinician dyad. It adds to the limited literature on barriers and facilitators to SDM in hospital care settings. Organizational‐ and system‐wide changes to service delivery are necessary to facilitate SDM. These changes may be enabled by education and training, changes to policies and guidelines to include and support SDM, and adequately timed information provision to enable SDM conversations.

Funder

Australian Government

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3