Flawed forensics: Statistical failings of microscopic hair analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Flawed forensics: Statistical failings of microscopic hair analysis

Published:2016-04 Issue:2 Volume:13 Page:26-29
ISSN:1740-9705
Container-title:Significance
language:en
Short-container-title:Significance

Author:

Norton Jim¹,Anderson William E.²,Divine George³

Affiliation:

1. Professor emeritus of biostatistics, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC. He has been an expert witness or consultant in eight legal cases, including six that involved forensic evidence

2. Statistician at Dickson Advanced Analytics, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC. He also practised law for over 10 years, specialising in cases involving medical and scientific issues

3. Senior research biostatistician at Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics and Probability

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00897.x/fullpdf

Reference9 articles.

1. Forensic hair comparison: Background information for interpretation;Oien;Forensic Science Communications,2009

2. Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions;Garrett;Virginia Law Review,2009

3. Attempt at determining probabilities in human scalp hair comparison;Gaudette;Journal of Forensic Sciences,1974

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Predicting and postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy on forensic-object lineups.;Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition;2024-04-04

2. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy hair analysis after household contamination;Analytical Methods;2023

3. The limits of forensic evidence;Significance;2019-04

4. Do Identities Matter?;Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice;2017-06-14