There ought to be a law! Campbell versus Goodhart-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

There ought to be a law! Campbell versus Goodhart

Published:2018-11-28 Issue:6 Volume:15 Page:9-9
ISSN:1740-9705
Container-title:Significance
language:en
Short-container-title:Significance

Author:

Rodamar Jeffery¹

Affiliation:

1. Protection of human subjects coordinator with the US Department of Education. The views expressed in this article are part of the author's ongoing research and analysis and do not necessarily reflect the position of the US Department of Education.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics and Probability

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01205.x/fullpdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Monetary relationships: A view from Threadneedle Street;Goodhart,1975

2. Problems of monetary management: The UK experience;Goodhart,1975

3. Assessing the impact of planned social change;Campbell,1975

4. Campbell , D. T. 1971 Methods for the experimenting society Evaluation Practice 223 260

5. Reforms as experiments;Campbell;American Psychologist,1969

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Applying a systems thinking lens to anti-doping: A systematic review identifying the contributory factors to doping in sport;Journal of Sports Sciences;2024-01-29

2. Improving Balance in Educational Measurement: A Legacy of E. F. Lindquist;Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics;2024-01-07

3. Against Predictive Optimization: On the Legitimacy of Decision-Making Algorithms that Optimize Predictive Accuracy;ACM Journal on Responsible Computing;2023-12-13

4. Building less-flawed metrics: Understanding and creating better measurement and incentive systems;Patterns;2023-10

5. Theory and methods of the multiverse: an application for panel-based models;Quality & Quantity;2023-06-26