Longitudinal associations between lie evaluations and frequency: The moderating role of age

Author:

Dykstra Victoria W.1ORCID,Willoughby Teena1,Evans Angela D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Psychology Department Brock University St. Catharines Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractWhile previous studies have demonstrated correlations between children and adolescents’ evaluations of lies and lie‐telling behaviors, the temporal order of these associations over time and changes across this developmental period remain unexamined. The current study examined longitudinal associations among children and adolescents’ (N = 1128; Mage = 11.54, SD = 1.68, 49.80% male, and 83.6% white) evaluations of lies to parents for autonomy and lie‐telling frequency to parents and friends. Autoregressive cross‐lagged analysis revealed longitudinal associations moderated by age. Among children, evaluations of lies predicted greater lie‐telling rates over time. Conversely, among adolescents, lie‐telling frequency predicted lie evaluations over time, and evaluations predicted lying to parents over time. These results demonstrate a novel developmental pattern of the associations between moral evaluations of lies and lie‐telling.Research Highlights Children and adolescents’ evaluations of lie‐telling and lie‐telling frequency were associated longitudinally, but the direction of this association was moderated by age. Among children, more positive lie evaluations predicted greater lie‐telling to parents and friends over time. Among adolescents, more positive lie evaluations predicted lying more often to parents over time; lying more to parents and friends predicted more positive evaluations over time. These findings suggest a novel developmental pattern regarding the temporal order of the association between evaluations of lie‐telling and lie‐telling frequency.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3