A comparison of maxillary posterior changes following facemask therapy: Skeletal anchorage versus tooth‐borne anchorage

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare changes in the maxillary posterior structure as seen in cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images resulting from facemask therapy using skeletal (miniplate/FM) anchorage versus tooth‐borne anchorage (RME/FM).Materials and MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 20 patients divided into the miniplate/FM group (nine patients aged 9.5 ± 1.4 years) and the RME/FM group (11 patients aged 9.2 ± 1.4 years). CBCT images before and after facemask therapy were evaluated to assess changes in the maxillary posterior structure.ResultsThe miniplate/FM group had greater advancement of the maxilla and midface compared to the RME/FM group (p < .05). Specifically, there was about three times more advancement of the pterygomaxillary suture in the miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group (p < .05). Moreover, the advancement of the pterygomaxillary suture was about half the advancement of A point in the miniplate/FM group, while only about 25% in the RME/FM group. Finally, the miniplate/FM group showed an increase in the transverse dimension of the posterior and superior parts of the maxilla (p < .05).ConclusionThere was greater forward movement of the pterygomaxillary suture with facemask therapy using the skeletal anchorage compared to tooth‐borne anchorage, leading to a more significant advancement of the maxilla and midface.