Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy Università degli Studi di Milano Milan Italy
2. Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research Ben‐Gurion University Beersheba Israel
3. School of Zoology, & The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
4. Laboratoire d'’Écologie Alpine University Grenoble Alpes, University Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA Grenoble France
Abstract
AbstractAimThe identification of biogeographical zones has been fundamental in broadscale biodiversity analyses over the last 150 years. If processes underlying bioregionalization, such as climatic differences, tectonics and physical barriers, are consistent across vertebrate clades, we expect that groups with more similar ecological characteristics would show more similar bioregions. Lack of data has so far hampered the delineation of global bioregions for reptiles. Therefore, we integrated comprehensive geographic distribution and phylogenetic data of lepidosaurian reptiles to delineate global reptile bioregions, compare determinants of biogeographical boundaries across terrestrial vertebrates and test whether clades showing similar responses to environmental factors also show more similar bioregions.LocationGlobal.Time PeriodPresent.Major Taxa StudiedReptiles, amphibians, birds, mammals.MethodsFor reptiles, we used phylogenetic beta diversity to quantify changes in community composition, and hierarchical clustering to identify biogeographic ‘realms’ and ‘regions’. Then, we assessed the determinants of biogeographical boundaries using spatially explicit regression models, testing the effect of climatic factors, physical barriers and tectonics. Bioregions of reptiles were compared to those of other vertebrate clades by testing the overall similarity of the spatial structure of bioregions, and the match of the position of biogeographical boundaries.ResultsFor reptiles, we identified 24 evolutionarily unique regions, nested within 14 realms. Biogeographical boundaries of reptiles were related to both climatic factors and past tectonic movements. Bioregions were very consistent across vertebrate clades. Bioregions of reptiles and mammals showed the highest similarity, followed by reptiles/birds and mammals/birds while amphibian bioregions were less similar to those of the other clades.Main ConclusionsThe overall high similarity among bioregions suggests that bioregionalization was affected by similar underlying processes across terrestrial vertebrates. Nevertheless, clades with different eco‐physiological characteristics respond somewhat differently to the same environmental factors, resulting in similar but not identical regionalizations across vertebrate clades.
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Global and Planetary Change
Reference70 articles.
1. Fitting Conditional and Simultaneous Autoregressive Spatial Models in hglm
2. Madagascar’s extraordinary biodiversity: Evolution, distribution, and use
3. Baselga A. Orme D. Villeger S. De Bortoli J. Leprieur F. &Logez M.(2021).Betapart: Partitioning Beta diversity into turnover and Nestedness components. R Package Version 1.5.4.https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/betapart/index.html
4. Regression analysis of spatial data
5. Human activity is altering the world’s zoogeographical regions
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献