Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences Nord University Bodø Norway
2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Kolding Hospital Kolding Denmark
3. Department of Regional Health University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
Abstract
AbstractDignity is a central value in care for aged adults, and it must be protected and respected. With demographic changes leading to an aging population, health ministries are increasingly investing in digitalization. However, using unfamiliar digital technology can be challenging and thus impact aged adults' dignity and well‐being. The INNOVATEDIGNITY project aims to research new, dignified ways of engaging with aged adults to shape digital developments in care delivery. This qualitative study aimed to explore how innovative digitally‐led healthcare have influenced aged adults' well‐being and dignity through three studies conducted as part of the INNOVATEDIGNITY project: a scoping review, an empirical study and a policy analysis. The three documents were analysed to uncover meanings relevant to the research problem revealing four main themes: the advantages of new technologies in facilitating aged adults' well‐being, the rupture of dignity due to bewilderment in the digital world, aged adults' dignity is affected by their worries about human face of care being replaced by technology and preserving aged adults' dignity in digitally‐led healthcare. Digitalization in healthcare impacts aged adults' well‐being as providing new opportunities for care, but preserving aged adults' dignity when working with unfamiliar digital innovations is challenging. Aged adults need to be informed about the use of technology in their care and supported to develop the necessary digital skills to better adapt to digitally‐led healthcare. The circumstances, conditions and needs of individuals should remain central when implementing new technologies in healthcare settings in a dignified way.
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahlin K. &Snyder K. M.(2021). Person‐centered health care resting on digitalization and systematic process. A position paper.Global Health: The Tenth International Conference on Global Health Challenges.
2. Alvesson M. &Sköldberg K.(2020). Tolking och Reflektion (interpreting and reflection). Vitenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod (Philosophy of science and qualitative method). Studentlitteratur AB: Lund.
3. Digital Inclusion & Health Communication: A Rapid Review of Literature
4. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
5. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2012).Official Journal of the European Union (2012/C 326/02).https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2012/oj