Bite hard: Linking cranial loading mechanics to ecological differences in gnawing behavior in caviomorph rodents

Abstract

AbstractThe mammalian skull is very malleable and has notably radiated into highly diverse morphologies, fulfilling a broad range of functional needs. Although gnawing is relatively common in mammals, this behavior and its associated morphology are diagnostic features for rodents. These animals possess a very versatile and highly mechanically advantageous masticatory apparatus, which, for instance, allowed caviomorph rodents to colonize South America during the Mid‐Eocene and successfully radiate in over 200 extant species throughout most continental niches. Previous work has shown that differences in bite force within caviomorphs could be better explained by changes in muscle development than in mechanical advantages (i.e., in cranial overall morphology). Considering the strong bites they apply, it is interesting to assess how the reaction forces upon the incisors (compression) and the powerful adductor musculature pulling (tension) mechanically affect the cranium, especially between species with different ecologies (e.g., chisel‐tooth digging). Thus, we ran finite element analyses upon crania of the subterranean Talas' tuco‐tuco Ctenomys talarum, the semi‐fossorial common degu Octodon degus, and the saxicolous long‐tailed chinchilla Chinchilla lanigera to simulate: (A) in vivo biting in all species, and (B) rescaled muscle forces in non‐ctenomyid rodents to match those of the tuco‐tuco. Results show that the stress patterns correlate with the mechanical demands of distinctive ecologies, on in vivo‐based simulations, with the subterranean tuco‐tuco being the most stressed species. In contrast, when standardizing all three species (rescaled models), non‐ctenomyid models exhibited a several‐fold increase in stress, in both magnitude and affected areas. Detailed observations evidenced that this increase in stress was higher in lateral sections of the snout and, mainly, the zygomatic arch; between approximately 2.5–3.5 times in the common degu and 4.0–5.0 times in the long‐tailed chinchilla. Yet, neither species, module, nor simulation condition presented load factor levels that would imply structural failure by strong, incidental biting. Our results let us conclude that caviomorphs have a high baseline for mechanical strength of the cranium because of the inheritance of a very robust “rodent” model, while interspecific differences are associated with particular masticatory habits and the concomitant level of development of the adductor musculature. Especially, the masseteric and zygomaticomandibular muscles contribute to >80% of the bite force, and therefore, their contraction is responsible for the highest strains upon their origin sites, that is, the zygomatic arch and the snout. Thus, the robust crania of the subterranean and highly aggressive tuco‐tucos allow them to withstand much stronger forces than degus or chinchillas, such as the ones produced by their hypertrophied jaw adductor muscles or imparted by the soil reaction.