Affiliation:
1. Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, 8888 University Drive Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia Canada
2. Hakai Institute Heriot Bay British Columbia Canada
3. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zürich Zürich Switzerland
4. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
5. School of Environmental Studies University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada
6. Department of Physical Geography Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands
7. Department of Geography University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada
8. Raincoast Conservation Foundation Sidney British Columbia Canada
Abstract
AbstractAimSpecies distributions across islands are shaped by dispersal limitations, environmental filters and biotic interactions but the relative influence of each of these processes has rarely been assessed. Here, we examine the relative contributions of island characteristics, marine subsidies, species traits, and species interactions on avian community composition.LocationCentral Coast region of British Columbia, Canada.TaxonTerrestrial breeding birds.MethodsWe observed 3610 individuals of 32 bird species on 89 islands that spanned multiple orders of magnitude in area (0.0002–3 km2). We fit a spatially explicit joint species distribution model to estimate the relative contributions of island physical characteristics, island‐specific inputs of marine subsidies, species' traits, and biotic interactions on species distributions. Biogeographic characteristics included island area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity, while marine influence was represented by forest‐edge soil δ15N, wrack biomass, shoreline substrate, and distance to shore. This approach also allowed us to estimate how much variation in distributions resulted from species' biological traits (i.e. body mass, feeding guild, feeding height, and nesting height).ResultsBird species distributions were determined almost equivalently by island biogeographic characteristics (23.5% of variation explained) and marine influence (24.8%). We detected variation in species‐specific responses to both island biogeographic characteristics and marine influence, but no significant effect of any biological trait examined. Additionally, we found evidence that habitat preferences were a more important driver than competitive interactions.Main ConclusionsAlthough most island biogeographic studies focus only on islands' physical characteristics, we found evidence for an equivalent role of marine subsidy in structuring island bird communities. Our study suggests that for small islands, disentangling the effects of island biogeographic characteristics, marine inputs, and biotic interactions is a useful next step in understanding species distributions.
Funder
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Mitacs
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Tula Foundation
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics