An exploration of frontline health professional's current understanding of non‐fatal strangulation

Author:

Donaldson A. E.1ORCID,Ravono A.2,Hurren E.3,Harvey C.4,Baldwin A.5,Solomon B.6

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing Manawatu Campus, Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand

2. Umanand Prasad School of Medicine & Health Sciences University of Fiji, Saweni Campus Lautoka Fiji

3. School of Criminology and criminal justice, Mount Gravatt Campus Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. School of Nursing Massey University, Wellington Campus Wellington New Zealand

5. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Townsville Campus CQ University Townsville Queensland Australia

6. School of Nursing, Manakau Insitute of Technology Manakau Auckland New Zealand

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore frontline health professionals' current understanding of non‐fatal strangulation and their need for and support for a comprehensive education and screening package to support health delivery.DesignA descriptive mixed‐method approach was chosen to analyse responses to an anonymous, online survey consisting of ten Likert scale, open‐ended and five demographic questions. 103 frontline health professionals (nurses, doctors, paramedics, midwives) participated in this study.MethodsContent analysis of the Likert scale and open‐ended questions describing the subjective experiences and perceptions of the participants was undertaken along with percentage and frequency counts of the rated Likert responses.ResultsThe findings identified that 51.1% of health professionals do not ask about strangulation routinely and that 59% of health professionals reported receiving no formal education or professional development on NFS to enhance their knowledge or inform clinical practice. No health professionals identified mild traumatic brain injury as a consequence or sign of strangulation, nor did they identify an understanding that 50% of people may have no visible injuries after being strangled. Health professionals also do not routinely document the different agencies referred to or involved in supporting the person who experienced NFS.ConclusionFindings suggest that frontline health professionals lack the confidence, skills and education needed to meet medical obligations to their patients and to fulfil their duty to ‘do no harm’. Frontline health professionals would welcome a comprehensive education and screening package to guide recognition and response to non‐fatal strangulation in their clinical settings.Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact?The purpose of the study was to understand and explore health professionals' knowledge about non‐fatal strangulation so that improved education around better screening, and management of trauma‐focused care to people who have been subjected to non‐fatal strangulation could occur.No Patient or Public ContributionThis review contains no patient or public contribution since it examines health professionals' knowledge of identifying non‐fatal strangulation and the screening and assessment tools used in clinical practice.

Funder

Health Research Council of New Zealand

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Beres M. A. Pearman‐Beres L. J. &Johns P.(2020).“Youth healthy and safe relationships: A literature review” University of Otago.https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/10531/Beres%20et%20al%20YHSR%20Report%20Final.pdf?sequence=1

2. The neuropsychological outcomes of non-fatal strangulation in domestic and sexual violence: A systematic review

3. Communicating consent in sport: A typological model of athletes’ consent practices within combat sports

4. Family violence in New Zealand: A primary healthcare nursing perspective;Davis G.;Whitireia Nursing Journal,2007

5. Family violence in the news: an analysis of media reporting of family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nonfatal Strangulation;Reference Module in Social Sciences;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3