A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing different strategies to implement noninvasive prenatal testing into a Down syndrome screening program-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing different strategies to implement noninvasive prenatal testing into a Down syndrome screening program

Published:2014-09-08 Issue:5 Volume:54 Page:412-417
ISSN:0004-8666
Container-title:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol

Author:

Ayres Alice C.¹,Whitty Jennifer A.²³,Ellwood David A.⁴

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine; Gold Coast Campus; Griffith University; Gold Coast Queensland Australia

2. Population and Social Health Research Program; Griffith Health Institute; Centre for Applied Health Economics; School of Medicine; Griffith University; Logan Queensland Australia

3. School of Pharmacy; University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. School of Medicine; Griffith University; Gold Coast Campus; Gold Coast Queensland Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,General Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/ajo.12223/fullpdf

Reference31 articles.

1. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study;Chiu;BMJ,2011

2. Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 by sequencing of DNA in maternal blood: a study in a clinical setting;Ehrich;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2011

3. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study;Palomaki;Genet Med,2011