Benefits and risks of non‐factor therapies: Redefining haemophilia treatment goals in the era of new technologies

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOver the last decades progress in haemophilia treatment has been remarkable and prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates in haemophilia A and B has been established as the standard of care in individuals with haemophilia and a severe bleeding phenotype. Besides clotting factor products with prolonged half‐life non‐factor therapies were developed which enable prophylaxis via subcutaneous administration. Factor VIIIa mimetics like emicizumab facilitate the coagulation pathway and are used in routine clinical practice for indivdiduals with haemophilia A. Rebalancing therapeutic agents like fitusiran, concizumab, marstacimab and serpin PC block the anticoagulant pathway and clinical trials using these products in individuals with haemophilia A and B are ongoing.Aim and MethodsA narrative review to asess the benefits and risks of non‐factor therapies taking in to account re‐defined haemophilia treatment goals.ResultsProphylaxis for prevention of bleeds using non‐factor products by subcutaneous administration is effective and results in reductions of bleeding episodes in individuals with haemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. The treatment with emicizumab showed tolerable safety both in clinical trials and long‐term real‐world observations with few thrombotic events. In some clinical trials with rebalancing therapies (fitusiran and concizumab) thrombotic events occurred. Monitoring of the haemostatic function of novel therapies especially with concomitant haemostatic treatment is not yet established.ConclusionWith the advent of novel therapeutic agents including factor concentrates with ultra‐long half‐life and improved FVIIIa mimetics aimed at raising the bar of protection into the non‐hemophilic range redefinition of haemophilia treatment goals is eagerly needed.