The effect of performance contingent reward prospects flexibly adapts to more versus less specific task goals

Abstract

AbstractIn some situations, for example, when we expect to gain a reward in case of good performance, goal‐driven top‐down attention is particularly strong. Little is known about the task specificity of such increases of top‐down attention due to environmental factors. To understand to what extent performance‐contingent reward prospects can result in specific and unspecific changes in cognitive processing, we here investigate reward effects under different levels of task specification. Thirty‐two participants performed a visual or an auditory discrimination task cued by two consecutive visual stimuli: First, a reward cue indicated if good performance was rewarded. Second, a task cue announced either which of the two tasks would follow (precise cue) or that both tasks would follow equally likely (imprecise cue). Reward and task cue preciseness both significantly improved performance. Moreover, the response time difference between precisely and imprecisely cued trials was significantly stronger in rewarded than in unrewarded trials. These effects were reflected in event‐related potential (ERP) slow wave amplitudes: Reward and preciseness both significantly enhanced the contingent negative variation (CNV) prior to the task stimulus. In an early CNV time interval, both factors also showed an interaction. A negative slow wave prior to the task cue was also significantly enhanced for rewarded trials. This effect correlated with the reward difference in response times. These results indicate that reward prospects trigger task‐specific changes in preparatory top‐down attention which can flexibly adapt over time and across different task requirements. This highlights that a reward‐induced increase of cognitive control can occur on different specificity levels.