Martius flaps for low rectovaginal fistulae: a systematic review and proportional meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRectovaginal fistulae (RVF) are notoriously challenging to treat. Martius flap (MF) is a technique employed to manage RVF, among various others, with none being universally successful. We aimed to assess the outcomes of RVF managed with MF interposition.MethodsA PRISMA‐compliant meta‐analysis searching for all studies specifically reporting on the outcomes of MF for RVF was performed. The primary objective was the mean success rate, whilst secondary objectives included complications and recurrence. The MedCalc software (version 20.118) was used to conduct proportional meta‐analyses of data. Weighted mean values with 95% CI are presented and stratified according to aetiology where possible.ResultsTwelve non‐randomized (11 retrospective, 1 prospective) studies, assessing 137 MF were included. The mean age of the study population was 42.4 (±15.7), years. There were 44 primary and 93 recurrent RVF. The weighted mean success rate for MF when performed for primary RVF was 91.4% (95% CI: 79.45–98.46; I2 = 32.1%; P = 0.183) and that for recurrent RVF was 77.5% (95% CI: 62.24–89.67; I2 = 58.1%; P = 0.008). The weighted mean complication rate was 29% (95% CI: 8.98–54.68; I2 = 85.4%; P < 0.0001) and the overall recurrence rate was 12.0% (95% CI: 5.03–21.93; I2 = 52.3%; P = 0.021). When purely radiotherapy‐induced RVF were evaluated, the mean overall success rate was 94.6% (95% CI: 83.33–99.75; I2 = 0%; P = 0.350).ConclusionsMF interposition appears to be more effective for primary than recurrent RVF. However, the poor quality of the data limits definitive conclusions being drawn and demands further assessment with randomized studies.