Assessing the success of National Human Rights Action Plans from a political economy perspective: The case of Chile

Author:

Fajardo‐Heyward Paola1,Cuesta Jose2

Affiliation:

1. World Bank USA

2. World Bank, and Georgetown University USA

Abstract

AbstractMotivationNational Human Rights Action Plans (NHRAPs) turn state commitments to human rights into policy. Despite their widespread implementation internationally, they remain little studied and there is limited consensus as to their effectiveness.PurposeThis article addresses this by using a political economy model to develop a framework to evaluate the success of NHRAPs. Within this framework it is argued that capacity, political structure, and political consensus are key drivers in the design and implementation of NHRAPs. We hypothesize that a country is likely to design and effectively use an NHRAP in policy‐making if at least these three requirements are met: (1) they are built on political consensus; (2) their perceived political benefits exceed their costs; and (3) governments have adequate resources to design and implement them.Approach and methodsWe evaluate this hypothesis using Chile as a case study. In 2016, Chile enacted a national law mandating NHRAPs. Since then, the country has adopted two NHRAPs: one spanning 2018–2021 and another covering 2022–2025.FindingsNone of the three stipulated requirements were met in Chile. There was deep polarization rather than consensus building; the political costs of implementing an NHRAP exceeded the benefits; and key government bodies in Chile lacked the personnel and mandate to implement NHRAPs.Policy implicationsThis study advances our understanding of the nuances of designing public policies for human rights, and the complex political costs associated with them. Unless political actors are committed to investing political capital and resources, it is unlikely that these plans will succeed. Our political economy framework can be replicated across multiple national action plans, countries, and contexts. Future studies can identify contributing conditions that can mitigate political costs, increasing the likelihood of the success of these plans.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference87 articles.

1. Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective

2. The Problems of Simultaneous Transitions

3. Baeza A.(2019 September 5).Ministerio de Justicia ingresó Plan Nacional de DDHH a Contraloría para toma de razón [Ministry of Justice submits National Human Rights Plan to Comptroller's Office for approval]. La Tercera.https://www.latercera.com/nacional/noticia/ministerio‐justicia‐ingreso‐plan‐nacional‐ddhh‐contraloria‐toma‐razon/810952/

4. Social Sustainability in Development: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century

5. Biblioteca Nacional del Congreso de Chile. (2023.Historia de la Ley N° 20.885[History of Law No. 20885].https://www.bcn.cl/historiadelaley/fileadmin/file_ley/4687/HLD_4687_37a6259cc0c1dae299a7866489dff0bd.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3