Sex‐based differences in safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Author:

Yadav Ritu1ORCID,Milstein Jenna1,Blum Jacob1,Lazieh Stefany1,Yang Victor1ORCID,Zhao Xiyu1,Muquit Siam1,Malwankar Jui1,Marine Joseph E.1ORCID,Berger Ronald1ORCID,Calkins Hugh1ORCID,Spragg David1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Medicine Division of Cardiology Baltimore Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundStudies have identified significant sex‐based differences and disparities in the clinical presentation and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Studies have shown women are less likely to be referred for catheter ablation, are older at the time of ablation, and are more likely to have recurrence after ablation. However, in most studies investigating AF ablation outcomes, the female cohorts were relatively small. The impact of sex on the outcome and safety of ablation procedures is still unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate sex‐based differences in outcomes and complications after AF catheter ablation, with a significant female cohortMethodIn this retrospective study, patients undergoing AF ablation from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2021, were included. We investigated clinical characteristics, duration and progression of AF, number of EP appointments from diagnosis to ablation, procedural data, and procedure complications.ResultsTotal of 1346 patients underwent first catheter ablation for AF during this period, including 896 (66.5%) male and 450 (33.4%) female patients. Female patients were older at the time of ablation (66.2 vs. 62.4 years; p < .001). Women had higher CHA2DS2‐VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, sex category) scores (3 vs. 2; p < .001) than men, expectedly, as the female sex warrants an additional point. 25.3% female patients had PersAF at the time of diagnosis versus 35.3% male patients (p < .001). At the time of ablation, 31.8% female patients had PersAF as compared to 43.1% male patients (p < .001), indicating progression of PAF to PersAF in both sexes. Women tried more AADs than men before ablation (1.13 vs. 0.98; p = .002). Male and female patients had no statistically significant difference in (a) arrhythmia recurrence at 1‐year post ablation (27.7% vs. 30%; p = .38) or (b) procedural complication rate (1.8% vs. 3.1%; p = .56).ConclusionFemale patients were older and had higher CHA2DS2‐VASc scores compared to males at the time of AF ablation. Women tried more AADs than men before ablation. One‐year arrhythmia recurrence rates and procedural complications were similar in both sexes. No sex‐based differences were observed in safety and efficacy of ablation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3