Affiliation:
1. Delivery Room Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital Ningbo China
2. Obstetric Ward Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital Ningbo China
Abstract
AbstractThe efficacy of episiotomy, particularly the angle of incision in mediolateral episiotomies, remains a significant area of inquiry in obstetrics. This meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of low‐angle mediolateral episiotomy on perineal wound healing and pain outcomes in women undergoing vaginal childbirth. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PICO framework. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving low‐angle mediolateral episiotomies. Comprehensive literature searches were performed across major electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Data extraction and quality assessments were meticulously carried out by independent reviewers, employing the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. A total of 1246 articles were initially identified, with 8 articles meeting the strict inclusion criteria for the final analysis. The meta‐analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among studies regarding postoperative pain (p < 0.0001, I2 = 77.5%), and employed a random‐effects model. Results showed that low‐angle episiotomies significantly reduced postoperative pain (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17–0.42, p < 0.001), and increased first‐degree healing rates (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 2.20–3.96, p < 0.001) compared to traditional angles. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected. The analysis suggests that low‐angle episiotomies can potentially reduce postoperative perineal pain and enhance wound healing. However, the limited number and varying quality of the included studies warrant cautious interpretation of these results. Further well‐designed studies are needed to corroborate these findings and guide clinical practice.