A survey of obstetric and gynaecology doctors at an Australian metropolitan tertiary hospital to understand their views, training and confidence in abortion care

Author:

Phung Laura C.1ORCID,Said Joanne M.23ORCID,Neel Aekta1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's at Sunshine Hospital Western Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Maternal Fetal Medicine, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's at Sunshine Hospital Western Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

BackgroundThe barriers to comprehensive abortion care in Australian metropolitan tertiary hospitals are under‐researched. Previous work has suggested that negative practitioner attitudes and lack of training may play a large role; however, this remains poorly understood.AimThe aim was to survey doctors practicing obstetrics and gynaecology to better understand their views, training experience and confidence in abortion care.MethodThe method involved a cross‐sectional study via an anonymous survey at a single metropolitan tertiary hospital not providing substantive abortion services in Melbourne, Australia. Inclusion criterion was obstetric and gynaecology medical staff working at that hospital. Data were collected regarding views, training experiences and confidence in first‐trimester medical and surgical abortion, and second‐trimester surgical abortion. Data were analysed according to levels of training, categorised as RANZCOG (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) Fellows, prevocational/vocational trainees and general practitioner specialists.ResultsSixty‐one valid responses were received from 90 eligible participants (response rate 68%). An overwhelming majority (96%) supported abortion services. The majority of RANZCOG Fellows felt confident performing first‐trimester surgical abortion (89%) and first‐trimester medical abortion (71%); however, only half felt confident performing second‐trimester surgical abortion (50%). Prevocational/vocational trainees were overall less confident but overwhelmingly expressed interest in gaining further experience in abortion.ConclusionDoctors are generally confident in providing first‐trimester abortion services (medical or surgical) in the metropolitan tertiary setting. However, further work is required to understand ongoing barriers to comprehensive abortion care. There may also be a skills shortage for second‐trimester surgical abortion, requiring significant improvements in abortion training.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3