Efficacy of communicating periodontal risk on psychological outcomes and supragingival plaque control in patients undergoing first periodontal consultation: A parallel‐arm, randomized trial

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate the efficacy of the PerioRisk prognostic tool in implementing the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on psychological outcomes and supragingival plaque control.Materials and MethodsParticipants underwent MI immediately after their first periodontal visit. According to a parallel‐arm, randomized study design, MI was performed with (RISK group) or without (CTR group) information on PerioRisk level and treatment goals based on PerioRisk output. Psychological outcomes were assessed using the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). Plaque index (PI) was re‐evaluated after 8–12 weeks.ResultsSignificant improvements in PMT overall score and PI were observed in CTR and RISK groups, without inter‐group difference in PANAS and PMT overall scores and PI. A sub‐analysis showed that the overall PMT scores recorded immediately after MI in both CTR and RISK groups for subjects with no tooth loss due to periodontitis were higher than those recorded before MI in subjects with tooth loss due to periodontitis.ConclusionsAt first periodontal visit, MI (implemented with without PerioRisk) has tangible effects on psychological outcomes and supragingival plaque control and seems to anticipate the awareness that is commonly generated by periodontitis‐related tooth loss (ClinicalTrials.gov protocol registration ID: NCT05078411).