Adversity profiles of children receiving care and support from social services: A latent‐class analysis of school‐aged children in Wales

Author:

Anthony Rebecca12ORCID,Scourfield Jonathan3,Moore Graham12,Paranjothy Shantini45,Evans Annette4,Brophy Sinead6,Daniel Rhian4,Long Sara1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for the Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK

2. Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health Cardiff University Cardiff UK

3. Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), School of Social Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK

4. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine Cardiff University Cardiff UK

5. Centre for Health Data Science University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

6. Health Data Research UK Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University Swansea UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChildren receive care and support from social services due to the risk of harm or impeded development or because of disability. This study aimed to identify typologies of adversity experienced by children receiving care and support from social services and to explore how typologies differ by sociodemographic characteristics.MethodsThis is a cross‐sectional study of ‘Children Receiving Care and Support’ (N = 12 792) during 2017/2018 in Wales, UK. We sought to (1) examine the prevalence of household adversities experienced by children in receipt of care and support from social services; (2) identify typologies of household adversities; and (3) explore how typologies of household adversities differ by family characteristics (demographics, measures of social disadvantage, perinatal and care factors).ResultsWe found evidence for multiple risk factor constellations. The four‐class solution suggested four distinct classes of adversities: child disability (50.0%), low adversities (20.3%), family poor health (6.7%) and multiple risks (23.0%). Children in the ‘multiple risk’ class were significantly more likely to be younger, more deprived and ‘looked after’ by the local authority compared with those in the ‘low adversities’ class.ConclusionsGiven the presence of different constellations of household adversities, policies and interventions that address multiple risk factors simultaneously may be more effective and have longer‐lasting benefits.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3