Implementation of Eco‐schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Implementation of Eco‐schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States

Published:2022-07-08 Issue:2 Volume:21 Page:19-27
ISSN:1478-0917
Container-title:EuroChoices
language:en
Short-container-title:EuroChoices

Author:

Runge Tania¹,Latacz‐Lohmann Uwe²,Schaller Lena³,Todorova Kristina⁴,Daugbjerg Carsten⁵,Termansen Mette⁵,Liira Jaan⁶,Le Gloux Fanny⁷,Dupraz Pierre⁷,Leppanen Jussi⁸,Fogarasi József⁹,Vigh Enikő Zita¹⁰,Bradfield Tracy¹¹,Hennessy Thia¹¹,Targetti Stefano¹²,Viaggi Davide¹²,Berzina Inga¹³,Schulp Catharina¹⁴,Majewski Edward¹⁵,Bouriaud Laura¹⁶,Baciu Gabriela¹⁶,Pecurul Mireia¹⁷,Prokofieva Irina¹⁷,Velazquez Francisco Jose Blanco¹⁸

Affiliation:

1. Thünen Institute of Rural Studies Germany

2. Department of Agricultural Economics Kiel University and Johann Heinrich von Thünen‐Institut, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume, Wald und Fischerei Germany

3. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Austria

4. University of National and World Economy Bulgaria

5. University of Copenhagen Denmark

6. University of Tartu Estonia

7. National Institute for Agriculture Food, and Environment France

8. Natural Resources Institute Finland

9. Óbuda University Hungary

10. Institute of Agricultural Economics Hungary

11. University College Cork Ireland

12. University of Bologna Italy

13. Farmers Parliament Latvia

14. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

15. Warsaw University of Life Sciences Poland

16. Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava Romania

17. Bioeconomy and governance programme Spain

18. Evenor‐Tech SL Spain

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geography, Planning and Development

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12352

Reference5 articles.

1. The new eco‐schemes: Navigating a narrow fairway;Latacz‐Lohmann U.;EuroChoices,2022

2. The Common Agricultural Policy post‐2020: Views and recommendations from scientists to improve performance for biodiversity;Pe’er G.;Thünen Working Paper 175,2020

3. For a more extensive and detailed version of the present article seeRunge T. Schaller L. Todorova K. Daugbjerg C. Termansen M. Liira J. Le Gloux F. Dupraz P. Leppanen J. Fogarasi J. Zita V. E. Berzina I. Schulp N. Bradfield T. Hennessy T. Targetti S. Viaggi D. Majewski E. Pecurul M. Prokofieva I. Jose Blanco Velazquez F. Bouriaud L.andBaciu G.(2021).Eco‐schemes as a core element of the new green architecture of the CAP ‐‐ what can farmers and nature get out of it? Insights from 15 countries. Available online at:http://project‐effect.eu/wp‐content/uploads/2021/12/Eco‐schemes‐in‐15‐countries_CONSOLE‐and‐EFFECT.pdf

4. CAP strategic plans of all Member States can be found online here:https://ec.europa.eu/info/food‐farming‐fisheries/key‐policies/common‐agricultural‐policy/cap‐strategic‐plans_en#publishednationalstrategicplans

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards sustainable landscapes: Implementing participatory approaches in contract design for biodiversity preservation and ecosystem services in Europe;Environmental Science & Policy;2024-10

2. Do agri-environmental schemes target effectively species, habitats and pressures in French Natura 2000 network?;Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment;2024-10

3. What is the environmental potential of the post-2022 common agricultural policy?;Land Use Policy;2024-09

4. Potential of teff as alternative crop for Mediterranean farming systems: Effect of genotype and mowing time on forage yield and quality;Journal of Agriculture and Food Research;2024-09

5. The implementation of the new Common Agricultural Policy in France will not be environmentally ambitious;Journal of Environmental Planning and Management;2024-08-12