Affiliation:
1. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
2. The World Bank Washington DC USA
3. Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
Abstract
SummaryFood‐security implications of the war in Ukraine are exacerbated by adverse weather events, spillover effects from the distortion of energy and fertiliser markets, and domestic policies that countries around the world have implemented in pursuit of food security. Estimates suggest that the cumulative effect of these channels in terms of restricting agricultural and food trade is in the order of over 10 times larger, and their cumulative effect on global food supply is on average three times more substantial than the direct agricultural supply disruptions in Ukraine. The latter, however, disproportionally impacts low‐income countries that are particularly vulnerable to food supply shortages and price increases. In the case of the EU, although overall food availability is not at stake, food affordability for low‐income households is a concern, especially when combined with rising prices of other essential goods, such as energy and transportation. To ensure the resilience of domestic and global food systems, the EU and its Member States should extend a set of already implemented policies, including better‐targeted support for the low‐income households in the region, implementation of trade facilitation measures via international cooperation, and support for agricultural production in the most vulnerable countries, and should also facilitate the restoration of Ukraine's lost agricultural assets.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Reference15 articles.
1. Fertilizer prices expected to remain higher for longer;Baffes J.;World Bank Blogs,2022
2. Caprile A.andPichon E.(2022).Russia's war on Ukraine: Impact on global food security and EU response. European Parliament Research Service. Briefing. Available online at:https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733667/EPRS_BRI(2022)733667_EN.pdf
3. Cutting Russia's fossil fuel exports:
Short‐term
economic pain for
long‐term
environmental gain
4. Incorporating Nutritional Accounts to the GTAP Data Base
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献