Affiliation:
1. Ecole de la Nature et du Paysage – INSA CVL, CNRS UMR 7324 CITERES 3 rue de la Chocolaterie, CS Blois 23410 41034 France
2. LTSER, Zone Atelier Loire, UMR 7324 – CITERES BP 60449, 37204 TOURS 03 France
3. Université de Rennes, CNRS UMR 6553 ECOBIO [Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution] Campus de Beaulieu ‐ Bat 14A, 263 Av Gal Leclerc Rennes 35700 France
Abstract
ABSTRACTAccelerating urbanisation and associated lifestyle changes result in loss of biodiversity and diminished wellbeing of people through fewer direct interactions and experiences with nature. In this review, we propose the notion of urban wilding (the promotion of autonomous ecological processes that are independent of historical land‐use conditions, with minimal direct human maintenance and planting interventions) and investigate its propensity to improve biodiversity and people–nature connections in cities. Through a large interdisciplinary synthesis, we explore the ecological mechanisms through which urban wilding can promote biodiversity in cities, investigate the attitudes and relations of city dwellers towards urban wild spaces, and discuss the integration of urban wilding into the fabric of cities and its governance. We show that favouring assembly spontaneity by reducing planting interventions, and functional spontaneity by limiting maintenance practices, can promote plant diversity and provide ecological resources for numerous organisms at habitat and city scales. These processes could reverse biotic homogenisation, but further studies are needed to understand the effects of wilding on invasive species and their consequences. From a socio‐ecological perspective, the attitudes of city dwellers towards spontaneous vegetation are modulated by successional stages, with grassland and woodland stages preferred, but dense shrubby vegetation stages disliked. Wild spaces can diversify physical interactions with nature, and enrich multi‐sensory, affective and cognitive experiences of nature in cities. However, some aspects of wild spaces can cause anxiety, feeling unsafe, and the perception of abandonment. These negative attitudes could be mitigated by subtle design and maintenance interventions. While nature has long been thought of as ornamental and instrumental in cities, urban wilding could help to develop relational and intrinsic values of nature in the fabric of cities. Wildness and its singular aesthetics should be combined with cultural norms, resident uses and urban functions to plan and design urban spatial configurations promoting human–non‐human cohabitation. For urban wilding to be socially just and adapted to the needs of residents, its implementation should be backed by inclusive governance opening up discussion forums to residents and urban workers. Scientists can support these changes by collaborating with urban actors to design and experiment with new wild spaces promoting biodiversity and wellbeing of people in cities.
Reference271 articles.
1. Leverage points for sustainability transformation
2. Aggeri G.(2004).La nature sauvage et champêtre dans les villes: Origine et construction de la gestion différenciée des espaces verts publics et urbains. Le cas de la ville de Montpellier. (Doctoral dissertation ENGREF (AgroParisTech)).
3. Le Parc Méric à Montpellier: représentations sociales d'un parc public entre campagne, jardin et nature sauvage;Aggéri G.;Développement durable et territoires Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie,2016
4. The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation
5. Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights