Causes of stillbirth in ethnically diverse women in a Perth metropolitan hospital: A retrospective study

Author:

Sharma Kriti1ORCID,Bhat Saiuj2,Bhat Sangeeta Malla3

Affiliation:

1. Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia

2. Department of Vascular Surgery Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Armadale Health Service Perth Western Australia Australia

Abstract

BackgroundMost published reports analysing the differences in causation of stillbirth between different ethnic groups focus on stillbirth risk factors, with a paucity of data comparing actual causes of stillbirth.AimsTo determine whether causes of stillbirth differ between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian ethnic groups in an Australian context.Materials and MethodsData from all stillbirths occurring at 20 or more completed weeks of gestation between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 at a secondary level, outer metropolitan hospital, were analysed in this retrospective case series. Causes of stillbirth as determined by perinatal autopsy and placental histopathology were categorised using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification and compared between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian groups.ResultsNinety‐two stillbirths (0.7% of all births) were identified during the study period. A greater proportion of non‐Caucasian women had small for gestation age placentas compared to Caucasian women (n = 22/43 (51%) vs n = 12/49 (24%); P = 0.025). A greater proportion of stillbirths were caused by hypoxic peripartum death in non‐Caucasian than in Caucasian women (n = 4/43 (9%) vs n = 0/49 (0%); P = 0.044), and a greater prevalence of placental dysfunction was seen in the non‐Caucasian cohort compared to Caucasian women (n = 14/43 (33%) vs n = 8/49 (16%); P = 0.057).ConclusionsThe differences observed in causes of stillbirth between Caucasian and non‐Caucasian women are hypothesis generating and warrant further larger‐scale, multi‐centred studies using standardised definitions and classification systems to determine whether these differences persist in a more representative sample.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3