Deploying fetal death: “Fetal burial” laws and the necropolitics of reproduction in Indiana

Author:

Cromer Risa1ORCID,Bjork‐James Sophie2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Purdue University

2. Vanderbilt University

Abstract

AbstractWhile abortion foes in the United States rhetorically promote “life,” discursive invocations of death are foundational to antiabortion advocacy. Pro‐life strategists have made gains mandating the mourning of aborted fetuses through fetal burial bills, which require abortion providers to cremate or bury fetal tissue from abortion procedures. Fetal burial bills are inextricably tied to biopolitical regimes that make and manage grievable life. Drawing on cultural anthropology, feminist social science, critical race theory, and long‐term research on white evangelicalism, this article examines government documents (e.g., Indiana statutes, court rulings, health reports, legislative activity, and state prosecutions) to provide a discursive critique of Indiana's fetal burial law. Constructions of aborted fetuses as grievable human life and the formations of personhood they promote undergird what anthropologist Leith Mullings called the necropolitics of reproduction—a framework explaining how reproduction is constitutive of political regimes that use systemic violence to determine who (or what) lives and dies. Legal conceptions of fetal personhood that hyper‐value fetal subjects entwine with systemic racism, Christian ideology, and anti‐environmentalism to diminish the Black and Brown bodies and environments on which their futures depend. This case is a bellwether for broader dynamics in anti‐abortion policy and activism in the post‐Roeera.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology

Reference83 articles.

1. Floating Lungs: Forensic Science in Self‐Induced Abortion Prosecutions;Ahmed Aziza.;Boston University Law Review,2020

2. Arkansas Right to Life. n.d. “Crosses For Life Memorial Outreach.”Arkansas Right To Life. Accessed February 13 2023.https://artl.org/crosses‐for‐life‐memorial/.

3. Beusman Callie.2016. “Fetus Funerals: The Dystopian New Turn in the Fight Against Abortion Rights.”Vice October 12 2016.https://www.vice.com/en/article/qvdpbp/fetus‐funerals‐the‐dystopian‐new‐turn‐in‐the‐fight‐against‐abortion‐rights.

4. ‘The Mind of Christ’: Financial Success, Born-again Personhood, and the Anthropology of Christianity

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Abortion as a sociological case;Sociological Forum;2024-02-19

2. After Dobbs: Reflections on political and legal anthropology;PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review;2023-09-30

3. An ontological struggle: Islamic political theology and the criminalization of same‐sex sexuality in Indonesia;PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review;2023-09-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3