Improved obstetric management after implementation of a scaled‐up quality improvement intervention: A nested before‐after study in three public hospitals in Nepal

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe assessed the change in obstetric management after implementation of a quality improvement intervention, the Nepal Perinatal Quality Improvement Package (NePeriQIP).MethodsThe Nepal Perinatal Quality Improvement Package was a stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized controlled trial conducted in 12 public hospitals in Nepal between April 2017 and October 2018. In this study, three hospitals allocated at different time points to the intervention were selected for a nested before–after analysis. We used bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare obstetric management in the control vs intervention group.ResultsThere were 25 977 deliveries in the three hospitals during the study period: 10 207 (39%) in the control and 15 770 (61%) in the intervention group. After adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity, education, gestational age, stage of labor at admission, complications during labor, and birthweight, the intervention group had a higher proportion of fetal heart rate monitoring performed as per protocol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.27), shorter time intervals between each fetal heart rate monitoring (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.96–2.23), a higher likelihood of abnormal fetal heart rate being detected (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25–1.68), progress of labor more often being recorded immediately after per vaginal examination (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 2.55–2.93), and partograph filled as per standards (aOR 3.18, 95% CI 2.98–3.50). The cesarean birth rate was 2.5% in the control group and 8.2% in the intervention group (aOR 3.12, 95% CI 2.64–3.68).ConclusionsThe NePeriQIP intervention has potential to improve obstetric care, especially intrapartum fetal surveillance, in similar low‐resource settings.